What’s the ETA on EVs?

In July 2022, Bloomberg analysts reported that the U.S. has now reached the “tipping point” for mass adoption of electric vehicles. According to the report, the nation has reached the magic number that signals a period when “technological preferences rapidly flip.” That magic number is just 5 percent — and 5 percent of new car sales in 2022 were electric vehicles.

IMAGE: Shutterstock
The Middle East brings its own challenges to EV adoption

Although consumer interest is high in the region — local company M Glory Holding Group in the UAE opened its electric vehicle manufacturing plant in 2022 with plans to produce 55,000 electric cars annually to meet a rising demand for green mobility — there are still numerous obstacles hindering the widespread adoption of EVs. The limited availability of EV charging stations is one concern, but more pressing is the new demand placed on power grids by at-home charging stations. Traditional power-distribution grids are not designed to handle a significant number of EVs charging in the evenings when their owners return home from work. Utilities providers will need to predict and account for this surge in demand. Read more›››

EV manufacturers also face the challenge of keeping up with demand, not just for EVs themselves but for their constituent parts. Replacement parts are expensive relative to components needed for internal combustion vehicles, especially when supply chains are not fully developed and hampered by the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic on logistics around the world. Localized procurement is the answer for the future, but companies and suppliers need time and investment to set up and serve the local market. In a relatively nascent industry, this is not a short-term solution.

Included in those replacement parts are batteries and tires. Saudi Arabia announced a U.S.$6 billion investment in a steel plate mill complex and electric vehicle battery plant in 2022 to take advantage of its geographical location at the crossroads of the producers of the necessary minerals: lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel and graphite. But this investment also foresees the need for more batteries in the Middle Eastern EV market than anywhere else. Put simply: The sun and car batteries don’t mix well. Hot weather means higher temperatures under the hood, which accelerates corrosion inside the battery. In an electric vehicle, full of batteries, this is naturally an exponentially larger concern.

Beyond damaging them, heat also drains batteries, meaning less range available for drivers. A 2019 study by the American Automobile Association found the driving range of an EV could reduce by up to 17 percent if the temperature is constantly above 35C — which it is for almost half the year in the Gulf.

Charging the EV only adds to the heat experienced by the battery. Charging in the evening makes it easier on the cooling systems but that puts a strain on the power grids.

It’s all connected!‹‹‹ Read less

Sales for electric vehicles, commonly called EVs, are on track to double every couple of years, says Loren McDonald of EVAdoption. The industry analysis group predicts 40 million EVs on U.S. roads by 2030. In 2020, some 276 million vehicles were registered.

The industry certainly seems to believe in the proliferation of electric vehicles: Vojay Chandler, investment strategist at Morgan Stanley, says EV’s share of global auto sales is likely to grow from about 7 percent today to nearly 90 percent by 2050.

There are plenty of reasons for this. Climate change and its consequences are forcing people to consider their environmental impact. Governments across the globe are developing policies to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increasing energy efficiency wherever possible. Fuel prices are at the mercy of political instability, particularly in Europe, and governments are hesitant to introduce e-fuels.

As Nasir Salari, marketing expert at Bath Spa University, points out, despite the sluggish growth rate of electric cars, the latest report by the International Energy Agency in 2020 illustrates promising figures in major markets. The global electric car stock hit the 10 million mark, a 43 percent increase over 2019. And while China has the largest fleet with 4.5 million, Europe had the largest annual increase to reach 3.2 million. In the United Kingdom, 67,100 passenger electric cars were registered in 2020. This is promising, Salari says, but the adoption curve is still at the early stage.

IMAGE: Abjad

Salari conducted research in the U.K. looking at the factors contributing to the “sluggish growth rate.” He interviewed 336 individuals in the U.K. to assess their willingness to buy an EV. Like most analysts, he predicts a boom in the coming years, particularly with the U.K. government reaffirming its commitment to ban new petrol and diesel cars in 2030. With pressures like these, new cars will be electric, but people currently seem reluctant to dive into the electric future.

Credit: Abjad

“There are various reasons for this,” Salari tells KUST Review. “This has always been the case for new revolutionary products: the first color TV, smartphone, cameras, for example.

There have always been early adopters and then majority adopters and the people open to embracing technology in general will also be more willing to adopt an electric car. The TRI is a good indicator of this.”


Developed in 2000, the TRI (Technology Readiness Index) is a widely used scale in understanding technology adoption behavior and a powerful tool to predict the adoption of incremental and revolutionary technologies.

“Our data shows no difference between men and women in their willingness to purchase an EV or pay a higher price for the product,” Salari says. “However, the overall TRI is higher amongst men than women, and this difference is statistically significant. This shows that overall, men are more willing to embrace new technology and possess new and unique items in general. There was also no significance between age groups for their willingness to purchase, but I was surprised to see a significant difference in how much environmentalism played a part: The 50-plus age group expressed higher levels of green values than the 20-29 group.”

IMAGE: Unsplash
Bringing down charging times

One of the issues with electric vehicles is the charging time. But a team at Khalifa University is working on cutting that time down. Read more›››

On-board EV charging is generally done through two stages, says Vinod Khadkikar, who leads the project funded by Abu Dhabi’s ASPIRE. In the first stage, AC voltage is converted into DC voltage. But this DC voltage is generally higher than the EV battery voltage, so an additional DC-DC converter is needed to charge the battery. Most current commercial on-board chargers use a full-power processing converter at the DC-DC stage, which requires higher voltage and current rating of switches and diodes. This restricts the charging speed. The size, cost and efficiency of any EV charger also largely depends on the device rating and number of power processing stages.

The KU team proposes partial power processing-based topographies at the DC-DC stage that use a fraction of the power.

“Therefore, the DC-DC converter size is reduced and the charger efficiency is high (97-99 percent with hard switching). The semiconductor device rating is reduced significantly, which helps to achieve higher power density (smaller footprint/compact size). This lets the user use the same footprint size to design the charger for higher power,” Khadkikar says.‹‹‹ Read less

Interestingly, Salari found that most consumers were more concerned by the economic impact of their purchase, rather than the environmentalism aspect: They cared more about their investment than how green they were being.

“Electric vehicles are advertised as environmentally friendly and they are! And people know this, but this isn’t necessarily encouraging people to purchase them,” Salari says. “Environmentalism does not have an impact on purchasing an electric car; its functionality is more important.”

Like Salari, experts believe that demand for electric vehicles will increase as they become more affordable. Morgan Stanley predicts that continued performance improvements and reductions in the cost of batteries (which account for about 35 percent of an EV’s total cost) could lower the average EV price to $18,000 by 2025.

Salari says it also depends on consumer incentives: “People aren’t running out to buy electric vehicles because they’re good for the environment. They’re hesitating because they’re expensive but they’re in favor because their running costs are much cheaper. Regular drivers are more open to adopting EVs because of fuel costs, so it all depends on how you market your product. Enviro isn’t doing it: Shift your marketing to the economic benefits.

Prices will be lower in the future — that’s how innovation works. The first time a product launches, it’s not a cheap product, but as it becomes a mainstream offering, it will become more affordable. The market is still in its infancy. To grow it, we need more early adopters and government incentives are one way to drive adoption.

Nasir Salari, Marketing Expert at Bath Spa University

Tax credits and improved infrastructure are the way forward then. The U.K. is certainly investing in its electric vehicle readiness: Lampposts across London are being fitted with sensors and EV charging points to reduce emissions and cut congestion, and parking is even free in the capital for EV drivers. New-build houses come with electric vehicle charging stations as standard and many are fitted with solar panels to power this.

As charging infrastructure gets more support, subsidies and incentives become more robust, and governments enforce more petrol-banning policies, electric car sales will continue to rise.

“It’s happening,” Salari tells KUST Review. “It may not be where we expected it to be by now, but it’s happening.”

Deciphering the potential of 3D
printed structures

According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the average house requires a span of seven months to materialize. This includes a cascade of developmental stages: the foundation is laid, the framing is erected, insulation is packed, drywall is hung, the plumbing installed, and the electrical grid established. This calls for a broad array of experts. Now, the construction industry is pivoting toward adopting 3D printing technologies to respond more nimbly, sustainably and affordably to the dynamic demands of modern homebuyers.

Japan, for example, has demonstrated the speed, building a house in 24 hours. While the resulting build serves as an office space now, its swift construction proves its potential for future home-building on a time crunch. Japan further showcased this by fabricating a spacious villa in 45 days.


Time may be money and this axiom resonates well in the world of 3D printed structures. Data from 3D print technology company, COBOD, suggests an economic advantage, with the cost of 3D homes approximately 45 percent lower than traditional construction methods. Personalization is also an option.

3D printers for home construction are essentially giant robots, capable of rendering virtually any design specifications a homeowner might dream up. Want a home shaped like a sphere? With 3D printing, such whimsical abodes could be actualized. Plus, these printed homes come with integrated reinforcement, which means no precast or additional reinforcements are required, making it a greener option.

In 2022, ICON, construction tech development company, and the Lennar Corporation, one of the leading home building companies in the U.S., announced a plan to 3D print an entire neighborhood of 100 homes. These solar-powered homes, ranging in size from 1,524 to 2112 square feet, offer a vision of a sustainable future community.

Projects like these pave the way for solving global issues, from the pervasive shortage of housing and scarcity of skilled labor, to the rehabilitation of regions hit by natural disasters. Swift and cost-effective structures could offer near-immediate shelter to communities affected by natural disasters or to the ubiquitous problem of homelessness. A 2022 report from Urbanet, highlights that over 1.8 million people globally lack adequate housing.

“There are far too many homeless people. Working-class people can’t afford basic housing in regular old American cities. Construction’s too wasteful. Houses aren’t energy-efficient enough. At the suburb scale, it’s dystopian, almost, what we’re getting, right? We’re supposed to be the most advanced version of humanity that’s ever existed and we can’t even meet this basic need properly,” Jason Ballard, CEO of ICON told The New Yorker.


The scope of 3D printing extends beyond the residential. As the 3D home-building market grows, other regions are exploring 3D printed structures for office buildings, bus stops and religious centers.

In 2020, the UAE was awarded the Guinness World Record for the first 3D-printed commercial building which served as the headquarters for the Dubai Future Foundation. After a swift 17-day print, followed by interior outfitting, it stands as a testament to rapid, efficient construction, offering up to 60 percent less waste.

The UAE is also home to the world’s largest 3D-printed building and plans to inaugurate the first 3D-printed, fully-functioning mosque by 2025.

It’s not alive!

Whether it’s adhesions that mimic gecko toes or robotic technology inspired by land animals like cheetahs, many developments in science are inspired by nature. A team of mechanical engineers at Rice University in the United States took inspiration one step further, creating a new field of study called necrobiotics turning a dead wolf spider into a robot.

Spiders use their legs to walk and jump, but unlike most animals, they do so with the force of pressure rather than muscle contraction and extension. Spiders don’t have the ability to extend muscles in their legs, so after flexing, they push blood into their legs like a hydraulic system, allowing for powerful movements like jumping. When the spider dies, the legs curl up because there is no pressure present.

The team reintroduced pressure into the spider’s legs via a needle in its back, adding pressure to extend the legs and removing pressure to flex them. This allowed the researchers to use the legs as an actuator gripper to pick up items. They demonstrated the spider’s ability to pick up oddly shaped and delicate items and lift objects up to 130 percent above its body mass.

Its ability to pick things up isn’t the only benefit of using bio material: Nature will take care of the waste.

The actuator can camouflage in natural surroundings and the material would eventually fully biodegrade — unlike bioinspired or biohybrid mechanisms that use synthetic materials. The actuators were used in 700 actuation cycles before decaying — only one of the limitations of working with dead organisms.

Seven hundred actuation cycles is a low number compared with non-bio actuator grippers. A synthetic gripper used in farming to pick up lightweight food like mushrooms or berries, for example, would complete between 263,000 and 700,000 cycles.

In addition to limited performance, there are variables to consider when working with bio material.
Not all wolf spiders are exactly the same size so will not have the same longevity. Additionally, variation in size could affect the strength of the gripper.

“The concept of necrobiotics could play a role in inspiring more sustainable fabrication of actuators to reduce the accumulation of technological waste,” the team says in Advanced Science. Though this is a new area of research, they will continue to explore other organisms with similar hydraulic- movement systems.

What’s chaining blockchain?

What’s chaining blockchain?

Blockchain might be the most hyped technology relatively few people understand or actively use.

Its earliest and perhaps most famous use – the cryptocurrency bitcoin – has become a household word, with other digital-currency companies such as Ethereum and Cardano gaining traction in the public consciousness and with investors.

Despite wild price volatility and scams that the United States’ Federal Trade Commission says cost 7,000 people more than US $80 million between October 2020 and March 31, 2021, the crypto economy keeps rolling along, with market capitalization topping $2.4 trillion in May 2021, up from around $200 billion in 2019. And according to a 2021 Fidelity study, seven in 10 institutional investors expect to buy or invest in digital assets in the future.

But financial applications are just part of the hyped potential for blockchain. Boosters of the technology point to other uses such as securing medical data, tracking supply chains, facilitating votes and protecting personal-identity security.

Blockchain, however, still faces hurdles before it can be the game-changer it’s been promising to be since the 2009 debut of bitcoin.

Terms you should know

Hash: The function that meets the encrypted demands needed to solve for a blockchain computation. Read more›››

Non-fungible token (NFT): A unique bit of data stored on a digital ledger that can be sold or traded. It can be a photo, a video or any kind of digital file. Companies such as Nike, Walt Disney, Warner Bros., the NBA and Coca-Cola are issuing NFTs.

Nodes: The computers that make up the blockchain network. They store and update records of each transaction in real time.

Smart contract: A signed, unalterable digital agreement stored on blockchain.

Token: Unit of value that can be acquired through blockchain.

Wallet: A digital wallet that lets users store or transfer digital currencies.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): A digital currency issued on a blockchain/distributed ledger technology (DLT). Governments across the globe are running pilot projects using CBDCs. A 2021 Banks for International Settlements survey found that 86 percent of the central banks worldwide are conducting research on CBDCs.‹‹‹ Read less

  But first: What is blockchain?

Blockchain is a platform to store and transfer information in a way that is virtually impossible to change without other users knowing. It is secure because it is decentralized and its content is hashed. Users issue transactions to a public ledger that is managed and verified by a network of computers (called miners) without a third party such as a government, bank or other institutional intermediary getting involved.

A group of verified transactions is called a block, and the blocks are linked by complex puzzles solved by computers(“miners”) which verify the transaction and are rewarded for their efforts. Any retroactive change to the log invalidates each block that follows. The result is a certified, transparent, decentralized, tamper-proof database or ledger.

  Do we really need it, though?

There are difficulties on the way to blockchain world domination, however.

Perhaps the first hurdle to the Age of Blockchain, as Jesse Frederik of the Correspondent asked in 2020, is whether blockchain is a solution in search of a problem. In other words, are the problems expected to be addressed by blockchain projects better suited to solutions we already have?

But hold up, says Dragan Boscovic, research professor and co-director of the School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering at Arizona State University. Blockchain may need to evolve and improve, but it’s viable, solves real-world problems and is on a well-trod path to large-scale adoption.

”It is rather a common technology evolution, the same way you would upgrade from your iPhone 11 to iPhone 12 or 13,” Boscovic tells KUST Review. “There are numerous examples of blockchain technology being deployed to solve practical problems: One example is the (IBM) Food Trust solution for the food-supply chain.” (See sidebar.)

Also, says Dr. Ramesh Ramadoss, co-chair of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers’ Blockchain Initiative, it’s important to note that “blockchain” isn’t a monolith. It refers to a collection of various distributed ledger architectures. “Different architectures are used in different applications,” he tells KUST Review, “so, it’s very challenging to make a general statement about the actual usage or maturity level of the field.”

  An energy glutton

Another issue is that blockchain can have a heavy carbon footprint.

According to the Harvard Business Review, Bitcoin alone consumes around 110 terawatt hours per year – 0.55 percent of the world’s energy production. Together, Ethereum and Bitcoin annually eat up the same amount of energy as the residents of Belgium and Thailand, respectively, Digiconomist’s Ethereum Energy Consumption Index reports.

And each Bitcoin transaction, regardless of how big or small, represents $176 in electricity to power the mining, according to UK financial site MoneySuperMarket.

SOURCE: Digiconomist, World Population Review. DESIGN: Anas Albounni, KUST Review

The technology needs the resources, but the industry is already beginning to correct itself, Boscovic says, noting “Ethereum 2.0,” which completed its long-awaited merge in September 2022. The initiative promises to reduce its energy usage by 99 percent and be “more scalable, more secure and more sustainable.”

And energy consumption for private blockchains, however, is generally not an issue, Ramadoss notes.

Still, “blockchain by its design needs to have access to a large pool of distributed resources,” ASU’s Boscovic adds. “It is from there that it is able to extract value by enabling independent validation and real-time auditing of the transactions enacted across these resources. Initial blockchain solutions made great strides in improving their scalability and throughput (e.g. speed of transaction) as well as energy efficiency. Cardano network is (another) example of new blockchain design that scales well and exhibits great energy efficiency.”

Most people think finance first when they consider the applications of blockchain. But here are seven examples of real-world uses you might not have expected. Read more›››

Food safety: The United Nations estimates that 1.4 billion tons of food are wasted every year because of supply-chain inefficiencies. The IBM Food Trust looks to change that – and control other issues, including food safety, sustainability and fraud – with its blockchain program to help supply-chain users better communicate

Avoiding spam calls: India’s telecom authority insisted that providers use digital ledger technology to solve the problem of spam calls and texts to its more than 500 million mobile-phone customers. The result? Tech Mahindra created Hyperledger Fabric, which works with all of the service providers in India to manage unwanted calls.

Entertainment: Mediachain, which was bought by Spotify in 2017, is another use of smart contracts, helping musicians agree to rates and get paid.

Health care: BurstIQ’s smart contracts help patients and doctors manage the transfer of sensitive identity information and data. Other blockchain-based systems for medical record-keeping and communication include Patientory, Immunity.Life and Medicalchain.

Marriage: Rebecca Rose and Peter Kacherginsky in April 2021 used Ethereum’s blockchain to get married. The couple, both employees of crypto-based exchange Coinbase, wrote a smart contract and exchanged “rings,” non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in the animated form of two circles merging into one.
The digital marriage was performed in conjunction with a traditional Jewish ceremony when the couple used their phones to exchange the tokens. The couple named their tokens Tabaat – the Hebrew word for ring.

Human rights: Coca-Cola, along with the US State Department and several crypto companies, is working on a plan to let workers use blockchain technology to report cases of forced labor. The initiative was announced after the Know the Chain study in 2019 found that many food and beverage companies failed to address the issue of labor abuses in their supply chains.

Tracking vaccines: With the Covid pandemic bringing vaccines and vaccine safety to the forefront of the world’s attention, IBM (again) is stepping up with a project aimed to make sure vaccines are trustworthy and distributed efficiently. IBM promises that its distribution network will ensure speed, transparency and accountability as well as the ability to monitor for adverse events and facilitate quick recalls, if needed.‹‹‹ Read less

  Out of the shadows

A feature for many users is blockchain’s anonymous transactions, which is fine if you just don’t want anyone to know you’re really into collecting rare My Little Pony figurines, but it becomes a problem when that anonymity is used to launder money or for other nefarious ends.

But just because you don’t have to show ID doesn’t mean transactions are really anonymous. Identities can be tracked if you care to look hard enough, Boscovic says: “Blockchain is a rich source of digital information. With the right digital forensic tools, it is relatively easy to link a specific person to their digital identity used to transact on the blockchain.”

The FBI followed that sort of forensic trail after cyber attackers hit the Colonial Pipeline in May 2021, shutting down the American oil-pipeline system and demanding a ransom of 75 bitcoin (about $2.8 million at the time), Boscovic notes. Most of the ransom (63.7 bitcoin) was recovered; the US government in November offered a $10 million bounty for information about DarkSide, the hacking group believed to be responsible.

Of course, as law enforcement becomes more tech-savvy, users will find new ways to cover their electronic trails. The IEEE’s Ramadoss points to blockchains such as Monero and Zcash that were designed with privacy in mind and are much more difficult to trace.

  Eyes on the future

So what does a blockchain future look like? International regulation might not be a part of the puzzle. Ramadoss thinks such agreements might be extremely difficult given the fragmented nature of the global regulatory landscape.

“Crypto regulation varies from country to country,” he says. “Some countries are favorable (Singapore, El Salvador, Ukraine, Malta), some countries are working on a new regulatory framework (European Commission), and some countries outright banned cryptocurrencies (China).”

And ASU’s Boscovic sees no need for international agreements in principle. “Blockchain solutions are international and borderless by their designs,” he says. “Rather, the national regulators will need to interpret and map international blockchain business opportunities onto local business ecosystems and help their economies be competitive in such a global environment.”

  Who’s in the lead?

The experts disagree, however, on which regions are leading the way to a blockchain future. Ramadoss is betting on China (for non-crypto technology), which has been piloting the blockchain-based Digital Yuan project, and the European Union, whose European Commission “is funding the European Blockchain Services Infrastructure (EBSI) to serve as a single platform for issuance of identity, diplomas management, notarization of documents and trusted data sharing among the EU member states.”

SOURCE: International Data Corporation. DEDISN: Anas Albounni, KUST Review

Boscovic, however, puts his money on North America. “It is primarily due to the entrepreneurial spirit of the young generation, its sharp focus on the global economy and easy access to the capital markets. Europe and Singapore are not far behind.”

But both agree that the confusing nature of the technology isn’t a problem at all. Just as most people don’t have to understand exactly why the internet works to use it, blockchain users will access the technology through user-friendly apps, they say. And the blockchain future? When will it finally arrive? “It’s already here,” Boscovic says.

X marks the spot for clean water

X, the “moonshot factory” for Google parent company Alphabet, in 2020 began its first tests on a design to harvest drinking water from the atmosphere using solar power.

Now, in a paper published in Nature, the team has calculated the number of people such a device can potentially help around the world.

Net-zero water production is possible if such AWG systems are coupled to renewable-energy sources, such as hydrogen or solar power.

Ludovic Dumee, Khalifa University

Using WHO/UNICEF datasets, the X team mapped out where the people who have the least access to safe drinking water live and compared those locations to the areas with the best climate conditions (relative humidity at 30 percent to 90 percent) for using its atmospheric water harvesters.

The result? Up to 1 billion people who live in places with enough atmospheric moisture (in the form of dew or fog) to use the technology AND lack access to safe drinking water may benefit from this type of water harvester. 

Study author Jackson Lord notes that larger infrastructure projects such as desalination plants can take years to build. “This (model) can (potentially) leapfrog a lot of that and go directly to the source with a small device that’s solar-powered,” says Lord, who previously worked at X on the project.

“Net-zero water production is possible if such AWG systems are coupled to renewable-energy sources, such as hydrogen or solar power,” says Khalifa University’s Ludovic Dumee, who was not involved in the study. “In that context the footprint of the technologies, which may be decentralized, may become competitive with reverse osmosis. However the kWh requirements are still much higher for AWG than for RO.”

Similar technology is behind an industry-funded project at Masdar City, a hub for sustainability research and innovation in the MENA, with whom Khalifa University does research.

“As freshwater scarcity is becoming a global challenge, a promising route to overcoming water shortage is to extract water from air with innovative atmospheric water production (AWG) technologies,” says Samuel Mao, senior director of Masdar Institute at Khalifa University. “The research team at Masdar Institute is performing comprehensive assessment of different AWG approaches, and developing advanced technologies to enable water extraction from air with better energy efficiency and lower cost.”