MOOVE over cows, there’s a new
milk provider in town!

“Milk, it does a body good” is a vintage 1980s advertising slogan used to emphasize the health benefits of cow’s milk on the human body. Milk is still packed with loads of nutritional value required for optimal health, but the next time your palate craves an icy, cold glass of refreshing milk, consider a shift in sourcing from animals in green pastures to those wandering the dunes.

According to Home Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, milk offers 48 percent of the protein and 9 percent of the calories a child of 5 to 6 years with light physical activity needs. Cow’s milk is packed with 13 essential vitamins and nutrients like calcium and vitamins A and D that contribute to a healthy diet.

But the impact of the dairy industry on the environment and the subsequent impact of the environment on dairy farms has farmers shifting to camel-milk production to meet demand and their environmental commitments.

It seems camel milk can provide the health benefits of cow’s milk and then some with the bonus of a much lower carbon hoofprint.

THE ENVIRONMENT TAKES THE HIT

With 270 million dairy cows producing milk along with 2.1 gigatons of carbon dioxide every year, the dairy industry is responsible for 30 percent of all anthropogenic emissions. The environmental impact is ample, and with dairy product demand expected to triple by 2050 due to population growth and increased consumption, it is primed to worsen.

Primarily, methane emissions are a ruminant’s worst offender. Methane is produced in the digestive process and expelled into the atmosphere through cows belching, accounting for 20 percent of total global emissions. What’s worse: It’s 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide.

IMAGE: Unsplash

To be fair, all livestock emit their fair share of methane but pound for pound, camels are the eco-friendlier option.

Emissions aren’t the only environmental issue with dairy farming — there’s also land use to grow feed, pesticides for those crops, and all the water required to get milk from cow to shelf.

WHAT-ER?

The average water volume used to produce 1 liter of milk, including to grow the livestock feed, is 911 liters. This will differ between farms but it’s a big ratio, and when water supplies are also threatened, the cost could escalate.

Water pollution due to manure mismanagement can also impact surrounding water supplies. Overflowing and cracking manure vats sometimes cause seepage and, subsequently, groundwater contamination. This makes its way over time to all manner of bodies of water including rivers and oceans.

IMAGE: Unsplash

Camels, however, require significantly less water and can go two weeks without any, compared with two days for a cow. With a high threshold for extreme conditions, and the ability to lose 30 percent of their body weight and still survive, camels emerge as a definitively more resilient choice as global temperatures rise and food security becomes a pressing concern.

Food security is also impacted by the abundant land mass required to meet the nutrition needs of grazing animals and the pastures for grazing. This leads to not only extensive deforestation but the knock-on effects of further emissions and impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.

Whereas camels can eat almost any plant that grows where they live. Their long necks also mean they can reach higher for trees and will happily snack on shrubs, grass or even thorny plants.

Camel milk sounds like the clear winner when it comes to nutrition and sustainability, but it’s not easy to transition a massive industry. Dairy farms have been around for generations and in many cases are still family businesses. Plus, in places rich with grasslands and more temperate weather, cow farms still make sense. But when it’s more a matter of survival than that of public buy-in, people find a way.

FARMS IN AMERICA ARE LEADING THE CHARGE HERE

Historically, cows have been an essential part of many African economies, diets and traditions but heading into what could be another year of drought, the Horn of Africa and surrounding areas are in a state of emergency. A three-year drought that began in 2020 resulted in crop destruction, loss of grazeable land, livestock depletion and dried-up water sources.

Camel milk offers a lot of benefits, but the key is a stable market.

James Salfer, dairy educator-University of Minnesota Extension

In Samburu, a Kenyan county with a population of almost 310,000, people were struggling with malnutrition as most of their cattle perished.
Cattle farmers noticed neighboring villages with camel farms struggled very little, however.

The government had started a camel program offering one camel to each person eight years prior. So far, 4,000 camels have been gifted. Other African countries are also seeing their camel populations grown.

CAMELS TRAVEL TO AMERICA

Camel farms are not limited to sub-Saharan African countries — they’re also gaining popularity in the United States.

A 35-acre family farm in Nebraska called Camelot Camel Dairy offers camel milk to consumers who struggle with milk allergies or who just might be curious and somewhat adventurous. They are one of only two licensed camel-milk providers in the country and are hopeful that with demand, the price of a liter of milk, currently U.S.$16, will eventually become affordable and accessible.

“Camel milk offers a lot of benefits, but the key is a stable market. Farmers need assurance of demand, and consumers must be willing to pay the price of what it costs to raise and milk camels,” says James Salfer, a University of Minnesota Extension dairy educator.

The global camel-milk trade could exceed U.S.$13 billion by the end of the decade, up from $1.3 billion in 2022.

Delivering fresher salmon

According to EssFeed, the most consumed fish globally is Atlantic salmon. And while salmon is known for its flavor and rich omega-3 content, it has a notoriously short shelf-life. But preserving seafood often means using sulphites — additives that some people can’t tolerate and many would rather avoid.

Now, researchers have found a better way to extend fishy shelf-life.

A recent study tested three natural, medium-chain acids — azelaic, succinic, and glutaric acid — and discovered they can keep salmon fresh for nearly two weeks without using sulphites.

These acids were applied as edible coatings on both sliced and minced salmon and then chilled for 12 days. The result was less bacterial growth, better texture and color and less spoilage.

Notably, azelaic acid was the front-runner as the best bacteria-fighter. And while these acids weren’t antioxidant superstars, they still helped reduce harmful byproducts and preserved overall quality.

The big takeaway is that these natural acids could become a safer, cleaner alternative to traditional preservatives, offering consumers fresher fish and fewer health worries.

The team recommends more testing to fine-tune the formula, but the future of fresh, sulphite-free seafood looks promising.

The study was published in Food Quality and Safety.

More like this: Transparen sea

Shedding pounds and cancer

It seems like every day there is new information about the value of weight loss drugs in fighting diseases other than obesity. From addiction to inflammatory illnesses, these GLP1s are making their way through the disease dictionary and today they stop at “C” — the big C, or as most of us know it, cancer.

According to the Center for Disease Control, there are 13 cancers associated with obesity — for adults that is someone with a body mass index of 30 and above. This means that about two in every five adults in the U.S. have obesity. The most recent global study, put out by the Lancet in 2022, estimates that 1 billion people are living with obesity.

To narrow down this picture to some individual obesity-related cancer numbers: In 2019, 34.9 percent of liver, 53.1 percent of endometrial, 37.1 percent of gallbladder and 37.8 percent of esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer diagnoses were attributed to obesity, according to the National Institute of Health.


GLP-1RAs should be evaluated for control of these comorbid conditions during cancer therapy as well as for secondary prevention to delay cancer recurrence.

Research Team, Jama Study


It only stands to reason that weight loss would lead to a reduction in these statistics. And more current research agrees.

A direct obesity-cancer connection has always been a complicated argument because one person might lose weight and not get cancer but someone else might lose weight and still get cancer. The studies have therefore always been observational. But a recent mass influx of patients utilizing what most of us now refer to as weight loss drugs draws some numbers that can’t be ignored.

A 2024 study published in JAMA used those 2019 study numbers and aligned historical data with current obesity-related cancer numbers, resulting in a strong correlation between the use of these drugs (and subsequent weight-loss) and obesity-related cancer risk.

The study, using data of more than 1 million U.S-based patients with type 2 diabetes, found a risk reduction in 10 of the 13 obesity-related cancers for those prescribed GLP-1Ras, compared with those prescribed insulins or metformin.

IMAGE: Shutterstock

The correlation indicates potential use of the drugs as preventative. Researchers also note that “Given that T2D and overweight or obesity have negative impacts on patients during cancer therapy, GLP-1RAs should be evaluated for control of these comorbid conditions during cancer therapy as well as for secondary prevention to delay cancer recurrence.”

Louis J. Aronne, director of the Comprehensive Weight Control Center at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, says the handful of these drugs on the market is only the beginning.

He and his team are working on other drugs that aim to allow patients to lose more weight by targeting more hormones.

These drugs have a way to go before they hit the market, but Aronne’s team estimates one of its new drugs, an oral GLP-1 simulator from Eli Lilly, along with a couple of others, could be available to the public by the end of 2026. Several more in clinical trials will follow in 2027, he tells KUST Review.

More like this: Obesity expert has the skinny on semaglutide

Autism diagnosis within our grasp

Approximately 75 million people in the world have been diagnosed with autism, a complex neurodevelopmental disorder that impacts individuals across a large scale of severity and symptoms.

Symptoms are scored from 15 to 60, with scores under 30 considered low, 30-36.5 at moderate level and 37 to 60 indicating severe autism.

Experts say that early intervention is imperative to help each individual meet their potential, no matter where they fall on the spectrum.

Researchers from York University in Toronto and University of Haifa have used machine learning to impart early autism diagnoses to make sure intervention is timely.

They used kinematic features, namely a natural grasping task with only two finger-tracking markers that are indicative of motor control integrity. Using reach-to-grasp movements as data with those on the spectrum and those not, they were able to use machine learning to determine autism identification at 95 percent accuracy.

These findings complement emerging views that movement variability may reveal autism subtypes and could enhance early detection or intervention strategies.

The study was published in Autism Research.

More like this: Making the grade with EdTech

Tiny tool, big brain power

Scientists have developed a miniature iontronic micropipette — a fancy name for a super-tiny device that gently delivers pure potassium or sodium ions directly to individual brain cells like neurons and astrocytes.

This brings us closer to controlling brain cells without using drugs or electric shocks.

This is important because understanding how these cells behave is key to understanding brain function, and this device gives researchers a way to mimic natural brain chemistry with the utmost precision — without spilling liquid, blasting high currents or causing side effects.

The pipette’s tip is smaller than a red blood cell and works by releasing ions through a special membrane, targeting just one area at a time.

In lab tests on mouse brain slices, it successfully triggered cell activity and simulated seizure-like states, all while keeping full control and avoiding collateral damage.

The goal is to study the brain in real time with tools that are cleaner, safer and more precise. Maybe one day science can use this tech in drug-free brain therapies.

The findings, published in Small, have the potential to one day reshape neurology or mental health treatment.

More like this: Trust your gut?