‘Can we take a picture with you?’ Saying no
takes on new meaning across cultures

It’s never nice to have a request denied. But everyone needs to refuse a request every now and again, for many reasons. However, cultural diversity between speakers may mean that although one participant would be unaffected by a simple and direct “no,” another may need more from the refuser to save face in a potentially unpleasant situation.

Tanju Deveci and Jessica Midraj, both in Khalifa University’s Department of English, investigated how Emiratis navigate the cross-cultural difficulties of saying “no” when responding to requests for photographs.

Although the reasons for refusing may relate to social forces and cultural norms, the language used and the way Emiratis phrase their refusals is not as clearly researched. Deveci and Midraj asked 94 students how they would respond to a request for a photograph by strangers and published their research in the Russian Journal of Linguistics.

“Awareness of socio-cultural rules is essential for effective communication with people from different cultures,” the authors say. “Not only does this awareness include social norms, but it also includes ways in which language should be used to achieve communication aims. Communicating with people from the same cultural background as us is usually easier than communicating with people from foreign cultures.”

Although English is the most popular language used between people of different cultures and countries, it is not generally the meanings of words that cause difficulties. After all, there’s more to fluency in a language than mastery of grammar and vocabulary; a speaker also needs to be able to produce language that is socially and culturally appropriate.

CAPTION: More tourists are visiting the UAE. IMAGE: Matthew Foulds for Unsplash

“Given the advances in technology and increased opportunities for international travel, we interact with people from foreign cultures more frequently than ever,” the authors say. “Differences between cultural norms still causes challenges. Our competence in a language largely depends on our knowledge of how that language is socially appropriate.”

Sociolinguistics covers the effects of any and all aspects of society on the way language is used. This includes cultural norms, expectations and context, and considers how social attitudes determine what is considered appropriate language in a particular setting. For example, determining whether slang is appropriate in a conversation is a daily application of sociolinguistics.

“Using language in socio-linguistically appropriate ways is particularly important in countries where English is predominantly used by people from different linguistic backgrounds for daily activities,” explain the authors, who note that 88.52 percent of the United Arab Emirates’ residents are expatriates from various countries.

The country is also seeing an increasing number of tourists.

“Tourism adds to the existing diversity of cultures within the region, increasing the opportunity for people of different cultures to interact,” the authors say. “However, this also brings language and culture-related challenges for the tourists, expatriates and Emiratis, requiring all parties to have intercultural communication competence skills alongside language skills.”

Intercultural communication competence (ICC) is the ability to communicate effectively and appropriately with people of other cultures and can be thought of as cultural awareness. Lack of awareness of cultural tendencies can create communication breakdowns. One such example is the refusal speech act, where one refuses a request.

In linguistics, a speech act both presents information but performs an action as well. In their study with 94 Emirati English speakers enrolled in university, the authors used the following example, where a tourist couple asks:

“Your national clothes look very interesting, and you look so nice in them! Would you mind if we have a photo taken with you?”

The study investigated Emiratis’ use of the English language for the refusal speech act. With possible negative impacts on both the hearer and the speaker, refusals can be a particularly distressing speech act. By refusing a request, the speaker may come across as impolite or disapproving but a refusal can also be considered a cultural act.

Hard to say no

“The refusal speech act likely causes distress to the speaker,” the authors say. “Likewise, a lack of awareness of an Emirati’s communication tendencies and preferred ways of language use may result in the non-Emiratis feeling uneasy and awkward.”

The participants in the study indicated that they would feel fairly comfortable talking to a tourist couple they have never met before but gender appeared to influence responses to the request for a photograph.

Male participants indicated that they would feel more comfortable than the female participants accepting a request to take a photo. The results showed that 58.5 percent would accept the request, while 32 percent would reject the request and 9.5 percent would offer an alternative suggestion, essentially rejecting the initial request.

The influence of gender on speech acts of refusal varies depending on a multitude of sociocultural factors. Men may use more direct refusals, simply saying “no,” where women are more likely to employ “negative willingness,” saying things such as “OK, but only with my face covered.”

A considerably higher number of female participants indicated they would either reject the request or offer an alternative, with 31 percent of the refusal speech acts including a statement of regret, rather than a direct “no.” The female participants were also more likely to give a reason for their reluctance to be photographed, with five reasons related to tradition or culture. Additionally, only female participants used intensifiers in their refusals: “so,” “very” or “really” such as “I am really sorry.”

“It’s important to note that well over one-third of the participants stated they would either reject the request or suggest a condition, with female participants refusing more than male participants,” the authors say. “Alternatives raised by the female participants included covering their faces or allowing the photo with the female tourist only. It is also important to note the avoidance by all participants of the negation word ‘no’ and their tendency to apologize to the requester.”

Refusals exist in all languages, but their performance differs across cultures.

Softening the blow

The authors suggest that in the UAE, using certain linguistic features to make the hearer feel at ease is common when refusing a request.

Prompted by the urge to keep a tourist “interested and attached to the place visited,” a speaker is more likely to use positive politeness strategies, with men more likely to use a statement of regret and women more likely to provide an excuse or a reason. This supports previous research that gender responses may be influenced by situational and sociocultural factors, however the lack of literature on Emirati language use prevents any stronger conclusions.

Although the sample size for this study was small, the results show certain trends in language use by young Emiratis with a set of cultural values. More general research into the refusal speech act used by the Emirati population could consider different types of situations, age groups and social distance between speakers, which could provide more insight into the specific uses within the culture and across cultures.

“The refusal speech act can be a nervous event that every human will experience,” the authors say. “Saying no can be more formidable during exchanges with people from distinct cultures from our own. The fact that we are able to and required to interact with people from other cultures means we have to develop an understanding of the nuances of communication and appropriate responses so that everyone in the interaction can be comfortable.”

The study participants were students registered in the authors’ Introduction to Applied Linguistics classes. In involving the students in the research, the authors aimed to help them understand the course contents better, while also contributing to a greater understanding of Emirati utilization of the refusal speech act.

Play your part: this game challenges you to
save the earth, one decision at a time

A free, global-access climate-simulation tool aims to show the world that climate-change recovery is possible and offer world leaders the opportunity to create a well-rounded plan of action.

The simulation tool from Climate Interactive, called En-ROADs, can be used by individuals and groups. It allows adjustments across simulated industries and sectors to immediately show changes in the global-temperature increase.

Group events vary based on the audience but are essentially role-playing games similar to the Model United Nations. These events were developed to help policy makers, world leaders, researchers, scientists, students, etc., create a multi-faceted plan of action to ensure that global warming stops at 1.5 degrees Celsius, below the 2 degrees Celsius set out by the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Adjustable markers in the simulator either raise or decrease the temperature, depending on actions taken.

The group activity assigns a role to each player, such as a fossil-fuel-company executive, a government, a community representative or a clean-technology company.

En-ROADS offers insights that support the learning of people from any sector, country and age.

– Climate Interactive’s Yasmeen Zahar

Participants will lobby for their country or industry’s interests. They will discuss, negotiate and come to an agreement with other participants on how to ensure that the global temperature does not pass that that 1.5 degree mark.

Some actions that participants may take to decrease the global temperature include: implementing a reduction in fossil fuels, increasing green technologies, introducing a carbon tax or increasing reforestation. The digital tool will record adjustments as agreements are made and in real time. The process takes two to three hours and can be played in person or online.

IMAGE: Pixabay

“Since the release of En-ROADS, nearly 250,000 people in 140 countries have participated in an event with the simulator. En-ROADS offers insights that support the learning of people from any sector, country and age, and helps them gain grounded knowledge of impactful and equitable climate solutions,” Climate Interactive’s Yasmeen Zahar tells KUST Review.

En-ROADS offers free online training on how to run the simulation or the option to have representatives from the organization host and moderate. Groups can have anywhere from 12 to 300 participants.

The simulator was developed by the MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative and Ventana Systems.

Ask the Ethicist: Saving lives
while honoring religious beliefs

Habiba Al Safar

Habiba is a winner of the International L’Oréal-UNESCO Fellowship for Women in Science.

Habiba Al Safar is an Emirati geneticist, biomedical engineer and academic at Khalifa University. For her, consent and patient privacy are paramount. Also vital is respecting cultures.

I need to make sure everything complies with ethics.

Habiba Al Safar, Emirati geneticist and biomedical engineer

She gives the example of the age when a patient can give consent. In the U.S., it’s 18. But in the UAE, where children frequently depend on their families longer, it’s 21. “Always we talk to the guardians,” she says.

Habiba Al Safar is an Emirati geneticist, biomedical engineer and academic at Khalifa University. For her, consent and patient privacy are paramount. Also vital is respecting cultures.

She gives the example of the age when a patient can give consent. In the U.S., it’s 18. But in the UAE, where children frequently depend on their families longer, it’s 21. “Always we talk to the guardians,” she says.

DILEMMA: What would you say to the following situation? A small biotechnology venture has created a potentially life-saving bioengineered “skin” for patients with severe burns. Cells used for this are derived from porcine sources.

Patients and doctors from some religious communities might not want to use the product because of this, but assuming the product formulation can’t be changed, how could the company balance saving lives with honoring the religious beliefs of potential consumers?

Katrina Bramstedt

Katrina Bramstedt is a bioethicist specializing in organ donation, transplant and medical devices. Read more›››

She’s the former chief executive of the Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity, and prior worked for the FDA, as well as Philips and the Cleveland Clinic. An author of several books and over 100 peer-reviewed journal articles, Bramstedt is an international speaker and researcher.

Notably, she co-created an organ-donation app with Johns Hopkins University Medical Center (USA) that significantly improves the chances of patients finding a living donor for their transplant. She completed fellowship training at UCLA School of Medicine and her Ph.D. in medicine from Monash University (Melbourne, Australia).‹‹‹ Read less

THE ETHICIST: In this situation there are two delicate matters in tension, creating a dilemma. Respecting people’s culture and religious values is extremely important as these values are special and closely held.

Saving lives is another important value as this propels lineage and keeps families together to enjoy life. In some religions and cultures such as Islam and Judaism, pork consumption is prohibited.

However, life-threatening situations change the context, and blanket prohibition is not the reality.

Consider the following: Skin is a vital organ serving as a protective barrier for the body, with a special immune function that helps fight infection. In the setting of life-threatening burns, such as chemical exposure, house fires or vehicle accidents, loss of large amounts of skin is critical and patients are at risk of severe infection, dehydration and death.

And often, there is a shortage of human donor skin, and other options are needed such bioengineered-skin technologies. Considering all of these facts, there may be religiously acceptable exceptions to the general rules against pork products.

Biotechnology companies developing products with ethical sensitivity should consult with potential consumers as well as a bioethics expert. Additionally, they should carefully create patient-education materials such as brochures and websites to proactively address ethical concerns, giving patients, families and physicians honest and detailed information so they can participate in shared decision-making about product use and alternatives.