RED ALERT

In 2008-2009, a deadly algae bloom struck the Arabian Gulf. The cluster of Cochlodinium polykrikoides was so large it threatened millions of residents, the ecology of the waterway itself and even national security.

In the years since, smaller blooms, also called red tides or harmful algal blooms, have hit the Gulf region. And warming waters seem to assure that such events will become larger and more frequent in the Middle East and around the world.

Algae aren’t inherently bad, though, says Shady Amin, an associate professor of biology at New York University Abu Dhabi who studies the phenomenon in the UAE and the Gulf of Mexico.

LISTEN TO THIS STORY HERE.

“Algae are actually for the most part good and important,” he tells KUST Review. “Without algae there would not be life on Earth. They make the oxygen we breathe. All the fish we eat is because of algae. There are good blooms that happen in the open ocean. If you go to the North Pacific, for example, very well known spring blooms enrich the food web and that’s how you get whale-watching.”

But bad blooms? The kind fed by warming waters and runoff from human activity like construction and agriculture? They can be catastrophic.

HUMAN HEALTH

Humans don’t even have to be in the water to be harmed by a red tide.

The algae can produce toxins that build up in the food chain, so humans who consume the shellfish and other fish that eat these algae face serious health risks, Amin says. “Not to mention that in areas that have a lot of wave action, a lot of these toxins can get spread into aerosols that people can inhale as they walk across a beach.”

WHEN IS A RED TIDE NOT RED?

Harmful algal blooms are often called red tides, but they can be other colors as well. Read more›››

Some are brown, burgundy, orange, green, yellow or even bioluminescent depending on the pigment of the cells and weather conditions.‹‹‹ Read less

It’s not just walking across a beach that can expose people to these risks. A study in the U.S. state of Florida found a spike in hospital visits involving respiratory distress during red tides.

And some species may not be toxic, but they can still produce irritants that affect skin and eyes. That was the case in 2018 when Abu Dhabi authorities closed local and tourist favorite Saadiyat Beach to swimmers.

ECOSYSTEM DAMAGE

Fish and other marine animals suffer as well. Get a big enough bloom, and the algae consume the oxygen in the water, creating dead zones that suffocate other sea creatures.

Animals not in those dead zones can still be injured or killed, like humans, by consuming fish or shellfish tainted by the algae’s toxins.

The results can be devastating.

The 2008-2009 event off the UAE coast, for example, wiped out thousands of tons of fish and damaged coral reefs, according to researchers who studied it.

And a 2018 red tide left Florida beaches littered with rotting fish, eels, porpoises, turtles and one nearly 8-meter whale shark. Also in Florida the same sort of respiratory problems that affect humans can afflict manatees, a threatened species, sometimes killing them. The toxins can even produce a foam that fatally strips the weatherproofing from seabirds’ feathers.

ECONOMY AND NATIONAL SECURITY

Human industries suffer as well, and not just the fisheries that rely on healthy wild and farmed stocks in the ocean.

In 1995, a C. polykrikoides bloom lasting eight weeks along the entire south coast of Korea resulted in economic losses totaling U.S.$95 million. Refineries and other coastal industries take a hit when blooms clog seawater-intake systems.

Tourism, too, suffers when locations sold as escapes to the sun and the sea become unsafe – and unpleasant – to visit. That 2018 red tide in Florida cost the state about U.S.$2.7 billion in tourism revenues, according to a study from the University of Central Florida.

But the UAE, which relies on desalination plants along its coast to supply most of its population with clean water, faces additional threats if harmful algal blooms force the plants’ closure.

This happened in 2008-2009, when the red tide struck the Arabian Gulf, forcing Gulf Cooperation Council governments to order desalination plants to shut down. The 70 plants in the UAE provide most of the country’s potable water. And this alarms Athol Yates, who keeps an eye on civil-security matters as part of his work at Khalifa University.

“If you shut down the desalination plants, normally you have a supply for a day or two,” he says. “In general, virtually the only water you’ve got is in the water-distribution network, which starts with the desalination plant and ends with your tap.

“Of course, the bulk of that water is not used for drinking purposes but (for things like) watering gardens. If you can get a message out saying, ‘Do not use the water for any other purpose, don’t wash your car,’ it will last longer. But the issue is how long will that message take to get out,” Yates says.

The country has mitigation measures in place, he adds. “The government has built a water network with redundancy, like an electricity network. So if (nuclear power plant) Barakah goes down, you still get electricity from other sources. Same with the water system.”

There is also strategic water storage, Yates says, pointing to a depleted aquifer in Liwa that has been refilled to become a below-ground reservoir. “If bad things happen to the desalination network, they can pump the water there to supply the networks.”

It’s a limited resource, however. And it’s an expensive solution. The Abu Dhabi Water Resources Master Plan estimates that desalination plants’ decreased production during the red tide cost the industry more than U.S.$100,000 (Dh368,000) a day.

GULF CONSIDERATIONS

The UAE and the Gulf have other special concerns when it comes to harmful algal blooms.

For one, Yates points out, the current around the Gulf is particularly slow, meaning a red tide might linger longer.

“These long, slow blooms can shut down the (desalination plants’) intake across a large area,” he says. “When you think about it, the (distance from) Abu Dhabi to Ras Al Khaimah isn’t that long.”

NYU Abu Dhabi’s Amin has seen how long blooms can linger. His team watched “a really nasty bloom” in Abu Dhabi’s Yas Bay for about a year. The source is uncertain, but Amin suspects runoff from construction projects or other human activity.

Amin also notes that the Arabian Gulf in general is highly oligothrophic, meaning it is nutrient-poor.

“We came to realize this very recently,” he says. “What that means is there’s not a huge amount of biomass in the water relative to areas that have a lot more nutrients. So if you have any kind of disturbance of that system, any runoff water, from, say, development or agricultural land or a monsoon, or some kind of weather event, that can really disturb the system and suddenly you get a bloom. These things are highly unpredictable.”

The Gulf also makes observing blooms difficult.

“One of the easiest things that people use is satellite imaging. It’s free. And it’s always there. Unfortunately it doesn’t work here very well because the Arabian Gulf, especially the UAE coast, is extremely shallow,” Amin says.

“Satellites measure light reflected off the Earth. And when you’re trying to approximate if there’s a bloom in a given part of the ocean, you’re measuring the wavelength that’s reflected off the water and there are algorithms that can calculate how much algae is in the water. The problem is that if you have a shallow area, you have also light reflecting off the bottom. It’s much more complicated in that case, and that’s exactly the problem we have here. So relying on satellites here is not an option.”

WATCHING THE WATER

Florida invests heavily in its red-tide defenses, Amin says.

“We work closely with the Gulf of Mexico and the State of Florida. They have a program funded by the state with hundreds if not thousands of state employees that go out almost every day, and they collect water. If it matches a certain threshold that they know a bloom is happening, they alert the public and start taking action.”

The UAE does not yet have these kinds of resources, Amin says, “but we’re making progress.” “That’s what we aim to do.”

Oman, meanwhile, in early 2024 launched a predictive model to help warn of incoming red tides.

An early warning system is indispensable for countries in the region, especially as climate change could make red tides more frequent and deadly, says Jauad el Kharraz, head of research at Muscat-based Middle East Desalination Research Center.

He stresses that further research is vital to evaluate the relationships between red tides, climate change, ocean acidification and human health.

Amin, meanwhile, suggests that we should be looking closer at ourselves. “It’s only because of us overdeveloping our coasts and dumping things in the sea water that leads to these harmful red tides,” he says.

A BETTER FILTER

By: Jade Sterling

High levels of nutrients sounds like a benefit to an ecosystem, but when an environment receives too many nutrients, otherwise known as eutrophication, algal blooms and hypoxic waters can kill fish and seagrass.

“The high accumulation of nutrients, including nitrogen and phosphorus, discharged into surface water, rivers and reservoirs can accelerate eutrophication and cause great damage to the aquatic ecosystem,” says Shadi Hasan, director of the Center for Membranes and Advanced Water Technology at Khalifa University.“We need to control the levels of nutrients and develop innovative technologies to treat water and remove excess nutrients.”

Novel membrane technology, however, may be the solution. Hasan’s KU research team has developed a composite polylactic acid (PLA) and nanomaterial membrane to remove nutrients from wastewater.

Treatment technologies already exist. However, chemical methods can introduce undesirable byproducts; and biological treatments take much longer and are inefficient in the use of nitrogen. Additionally, no available method offers complete water purification.

The membrane works via adsorption. The research team used a functionalized positively charged multi-walled carbon nanotube/graphene oxide hybrid nanomaterial to remove nitrogen (as ammonia) and phosphorus from wastewater while enhancing water permeability. The nutrients are filtered out by collecting in the pores of the nanotubes at the surface of the membrane.

But such a membrane needs to offer water permeability. As more nutrients adsorb and collect, the amount of water passing through decreases. The research team’s membrane, however, offers high water flux even when filtering the nutrients.

The carbon nanotubes increase membrane tensile strength significantly, while the graphene oxide enhances thermal stability and tensile strength and provides antibacterial properties. This supports water flux and provides hydrophilicity to the end product.

While the effects of graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes in water purification are well-documented, studies are limited when it comes to combining the two as a nanohybrid.

“After a comprehensive review of the literature, our research group is the first to report the fabrication of such composite PLA membranes for the removal of nutrients from synthetic and real wastewater,” says Hasan, who adds that the team is investigating ways to scale up the membranes for larger applications.

More like this: High seas

Will weight-loss drugs work for
you?

You have likely heard of the weight-loss drugs that have stormed the market in the past year. And maybe you’ve even considered taking one but wondered if it would really work. Well, wonder no more — there’s a new genetic test that will answer that question.

Researchers at the Mayo Clinic have developed a genetic test that can determine if weight-loss drugs are a solution for you or if they would be a waste of your money and time.

About 650 million adults struggle with obesity worldwide. For many, these drugs are the answer to lifelong struggles and obesity-related health issues. The GLP-1 drugs, for example, work by targeting satiety – the biological process that tells us when we are full.

The team, knowing obesity is a complicated ailment made up of much more than genetic factors, was able to measure calories to satiation (which differs among individuals). This, the team says, is “an actionable trait that can be potentially modified by several weight-loss interventions, and, as a result, is a key factor that could enhance weight-loss response through a precision medicine approach.”

“Genetic predisposition plays a critical role in regulating appetite and modulating responses to obesity treatments,” the Mayo researchers say. “Genetic risk scores and polygenic risk scores provide insights into an individual’s inherited susceptibility to complex conditions such as obesity.”

The research was based on two medications, hentermine-topiramate (marketed as Qsymia), and a newer GLP-1 drug, liraglutide (Saxenda).

“Patients deserve treatments that reflect their biology, not just their body size,” says Andres Acosta, a senior author on the study and gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic. “This test helps us deliver the right medication to the right person from the start,” he tells the Mayo Clinic News Network.

Test results are expected soon on such semaglutide medications as Ozempic and Wegovy. Further tests will investigate the likelihood of side effects and gut-microbiome and metabolome data.

More like this: Obesity expert has the skinny on semaglutide

The age of plastics

If you’ve ever spent time in a museum, you’ll note artifacts that date back thousands of years. They tell us pertinent information about the past — from lifestyle to medicinal treatments and everything in between.

It’s our history. But have you ever considered what will be uncovered in archaeological sites thousands of years from today? It’s highly likely it will be a whole lot of plastic, but where’s the value in that?

A new paper published in Cambridge Prisms: Plastics argues that while plastics get a bad rap and wreak sustainability havoc on the environment, they’ll be the defining “type fossils” of our era.

“The type fossils are not stone, metal, or ceramic, but plastic, creating an archaeological record that is resilient and toxic, as well as ubiquitous,” the paper says.

IMAGE: Shutterstock

Plastics travel all over — they’re resting in landfills, drifting in the oceans, freezing into polar ice, embedding in farm soils, lodging in animals and even orbiting Earth. They may shrink into micro-plastics and nanoplastics, but they never really go away.

The authors suggest plastics and “the behaviors responsible for their distribution, produce an archive that may hold some historical and evidential value for society.”

They say plastics at the moment of discard enters them into the archeological record, “comprising material culture that represents human activities occurring at any time in the past.”

Such a record could contribute to understanding the full environmental impact of plastic and indicate the worldview of the “Plastic Age.”

The bottom line? Plastics still bad, information good.

More like this: Google Earth shines light on ancient Roman camps

Solar panel sunscreen

Solar panels, or photovoltaic panels (PVs) are a great clean energy solution. But while these PVs enjoy fun in the sun, extreme heat impacts their efficiency, resilience and ultimately their longevity.

The world’s scorching deserts are generally thought of as unforgiving environments, but the sizable, sun-exposed landscapes have proven suitable locations for vast solar parks.

Above 25 degrees Celsius, solar panel efficiency begins to slow. This is why researchers are on the hunt for ways to ensure climates with extreme temperatures, like the deserts of the Middle East, can capitalize on the numerous sunny days as efficiently as possible.

Researchers at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia have developed an all-natural hydrogel that might be the answer.

The gel, made up of everyday polymers and salts, behaves similar to a sponge. It absorbs water from the air at night and slowly releases the water as vapor during the day, cooling the panels more than 14 degrees Celsius.

The result is more energy conversion, panels that may last up to twice as long and lower price tags on maintenance and cooling systems.

More like this: Wear a coat

To flock or not to flock

Bird-watching has been on the incline around the world since the pandemic, and according to Audubon Magazine, there are an estimated 96 million birders in the United States alone. This makes up more than 30 percent of U.S. adults. And these adult birders spent U.S.$107 billion in 2022 alone on anything and everything a birder needs. It makes sense, then, that the birding tourism industry is also on the rise, but birders are selective about their destinations. But it’s not just about the birds.

The birds are, of course, a big part of the draw to a specific location, but a recent study shows that social stability and a country’s development level play more of a role. Even the flashiest toucans won’t attract this tourism facet if they feel unsafe or upon arrival.

Countries like Costa Rica and Colombia are booming with birding tourism, but other nations like Venezuela, even with their feathered diversity, are missing out on those tourism dollars due to social or infrastructure obstacles.

The study published by the British Ecological Society concludes that assisting under-visited countries to build up their tourism facilities and safety could help local economies and in addition support conservation.

The challenge is that the growth of avitourism must be done responsibly, ensuring the benefits to local communities and support and protection of fragile ecosystems that could be negatively affected by a surge of curious eyes peering through binoculars.

More like this: Angry birds